Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1161-1162 (24 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39583.414572.AD
Virginia Berridge, professor of history
1 Centre for History in Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London
Virginia.Berridge@lshtm.ac.uk
Although integrated health care has been presented as a new idea, Virginia Berridge reveals that recent history tells a different story
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Ruth Carnall, chief executive of NHS London, said after the publication of the Darzi report on Londons health care last June that "This is the most ambitious and radical plan for the NHS in London since 1948."1 The proposal that has attracted most media interest and public discussion is that of the polyclinic, typically the bringing together of a much wider range of services than that offered by most general practices. The Darzi report presents this development as something new in London and the UK. It cites an example from Europe, that of Berlin, to give an idea of how the polyclinic might work.
But a look back into history shows that the idea of the polyclinic is hardly new. Rather, it is the resurfacing of an idea that had a long and interesting history in London and in national policy in the 20th century. The first incarnation was in
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses