Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1158-1160 (24 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39581.507627.AD
Nigel Hawkes, health editor
1 the Times
nigel.hawkes@thetimes.co.uk
Despite government promises of local involvement, proposals for polyclinics and alternative providers of general practice services have upset both doctors and patients. Nigel Hawkes investigates
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Primary care, for so long denied the pleasures of NHS reorganisation, is finally facing a showdown. At risk is the deal under which primary care is supplied by general practitioners (GPs), who combine public service and private entrepreneurship within a protected market.
The private sector is being invited to tender for polyclinics and for primary care services across England. GPs complain that these changes have been sprung on them with little warning. Who voted for polyclinics, they ask, or for open tendering for primary care services and the awarding of contracts to private companies? GPs feel that they have been sandbagged by a reform that lacks political legitimacy or an evidence base.
The British Medical Association has launched a Support your Surgery campaign, while Ara Darzi, the health minister, has promised local people involvement and consultation in any changes to their services.1 But this promise has been made when the
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses