Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1146 (24 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39583.741921.3A
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Brabin et als success in achieving an uptake of 70% of two doses of human papillomavirus vaccine among adolescent schoolgirls is extremely encouraging.1 However, this pilot study has raised important issues that will need to be addressed before the vaccination programme is rolled out nationally.
Guidance is currently ambiguous in situations where there is a disagreement between a parent and childs decision about vaccination. Parental opinion is divided as to whether a girl should be able to seek the vaccine without parental knowledge.2 The principle of "Gillick competence" might apply if a girl sufficiently understands the concepts involved and wishes to make the decision for herself.3 However, given that the long term effects of this vaccine are not known, is it safe for children to be vaccinated without those with parental responsibility knowing? Furthermore, would it be ethical to apply Gillick competence in such a setting?
Elizabeth C F Brown, academic F2 doctor
1 Southampton University Hospital Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD
elizabeth.brown5@nhs.net