Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336 (24 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39588.493449.47
Tony Delamothe, deputy editor
tdelamothe@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Id like a pound for every new idea thats been rolled up into Lord Darzis NHS review. Hardly a week goes by without the addition of another one. Last week there were two: expanding the programme that has patients evaluating their own treatment, followed the next day by a proposal to use these evaluations to adjust the prices paid to hospitals. (Darzis review was "not about changing the way the NHS is funded or structured," you may recall.) IT professionals call this proliferation of objectives "scope creep," and its the commonest reason why IT projects crash and burn.
Whitehall watchers say that paralysis has gripped the Department of Health ever since Lord Darzi embarked on his review. Anything other than strictly normal business has been put on hold, pending the publication of his report. Maybe that partly explains the governments assessment of the Department of Health as the second worst
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care