Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:977 (3 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39567.361065.DB
Susan Mayor
1 London
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Haemoglobin based blood substitutes are associated with a nearly threefold increase in the risk of myocardial infarction and a 30% higher risk of death in comparison with other solutions used in blood replacement, concludes a meta-analysis published this week.
The authors of the study, published in JAMA (doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.jrv80007), argue that if the results of individual trials had been made public as they became available to researchers, patients may not have experienced adverse events in subsequent studies.
No further phase III studies of the products should be carried out for the time being, say commentators in an accompanying editorial (doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.jed80027).
A large proportion of blood substitutes—products with a long shelf life that can be used to replace blood lost by trauma patients or patients undergoing surgery—currently in development are based on haemoglobin.
Even though early trials raised questions about the safety of these products and failed to
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+