BMJ  2008;336:974 (3 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39563.442407.80

Letters

Screening for aortic aneurysm

No conclusion for men aged 65-75 who have never smoked

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Brearley cites the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) in support of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.1 However, it makes no recommendation for or against screening in men aged 65-75 who have never smoked. The task force did find good evidence that screening in these men leads to decreased abdominal aortic aneurysm specific mortality, but they have a lower prevalence of large abdominal aortic aneurysms than men who have ever smoked, so the potential benefit is small. There is good evidence that screening and early treatment lead to important harms, including increased number of operations with associated clinically significant morbidity and mortality, and short term psychological harm. The task force concluded that the balance between the benefits and harms of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm is too close to make a general recommendation in this population.2

The men invited for screening should be given this information as well as the likelihood . . . [Full text of this article]

John Doherty, medical director

1 IAEA, Vienna, Austria 1400

j.doherty@iaea.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Should we screen for abdominal aortic aneurysm? Yes
Stephen Brearley
BMJ 2008 336: 862. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ