Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:943-944 (26 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39513.642789.AD
Susan M Phillips, director1, Martin Gallagher, research fellow2, Heather Buchan, advisor3
1 Research Implementation Program, National Institute of Clinical Studies, National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne, VC 3004 Australia , 2 George Institute for International Health, Sydney, Australia, 3 National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne
Correspondence to: S M Phillips sue.phillips@nhmrc.gov.au
Improvements in clinicians use of graduated compression stockings are needed, supported by consistent policies in hospitals and general practice
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The overall risk of deep vein thrombosis is higher than 20% after major surgery and higher than 40% in patients having major orthopaedic surgery.1 The level of risk for individual patients depends on their clinical condition and the nature of the operation. Although a deep vein thrombosis may be asymptomatic, it will often give rise to long term morbidity, and there is potential for pulmonary embolism and sudden death. Graduated compression stockings are effective in decreasing the risk of deep vein thrombosis, either alone or in combination with pharmacological prophylaxis in high risk patients. Both forms of prophylaxis are used suboptimally in clinical settings.2 Graduated compression stockings should be used routinely for surgical inpatients.
|
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.