BMJ  2008;336:844-845 (19 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39541.622917.80

Editorials

Darzi’s review of quality of care in the NHS

Should focus on how to motivate institutions as much as what good quality care looks like

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In 2002, a bitter argument raged in the letters pages of the BMJ. It followed the publication of a study by Feachem and colleagues comparing an American managed care organisation, Kaiser Permanente (North California), and the NHS.1 The NHS fared less well on several indicators of effectiveness and efficiency of care. Feachem and colleagues (and others) concluded that a combination of competition, better information systems, and other incentives—not just level of funding—explained Kaiser’s better performance.1 The study was quickly attacked on methodological and ideological grounds.2

Intrigued like many others, a group at the King’s Fund looked more closely at the care provided for people with long term conditions at Kaiser and four other top performing managed care organisations in the United States. We found systematic highly proactive and personalised care—nothing in theory that could not be provided in the NHS, although it frequently is not. Our conclusion was that . . . [Full text of this article]

Jennifer Dixon, director

1 Nuffield Trust, London W1G 7LP

jennifer.dixon@nuffieldtrust.org.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

All the Cs
Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2008 336: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Can the NHS learn from US managed care organisations?
Jennifer Dixon, Richard Lewis, Rebecca Rosen, Belinda Finlayson, and Diane Gray
BMJ 2004 328: 223-225. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Getting more for their dollar: a comparison of the NHS with California's Kaiser Permanente Commentary: Funding is not the only factor Commentary: Same price, better care Commentary: Competition made them do it
Richard G A Feachem, Neelam K Sekhri, Karen L White, Jennifer Dixon, Donald M Berwick, and Alain C Enthoven
BMJ 2002 324: 135-143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

The dead duck of primary care comissioning
Hans-Joerg Paul
bmj.com, 23 Apr 2008 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview