Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:783-784 (12 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39533.358252.BE (published 3 April 2008)
Is effective, and could dramatically reduce unnecessary anti-RhD prophylaxis
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Non-invasive detection of fetal RHD status using maternal plasma is one of the few real advances in fetal medicine or obstetrics in recent years. DNA amplification of one or more region of the RHD gene can predict the fetal genotype with an accuracy of almost 99%.1 2 This means that invasive procedures (amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling)—which carry a small but important risk of pregnancy loss and may also increase the risk of sensitisation in pregnancies at risk from fetal haemolytic disease—can be abandoned.
Non-invasive ascertainment of the fetal RHD genotype (and other red cell antigens) is now used routinely in the United Kingdom and elsewhere in the world.3 The technology, although labour intensive, is relatively simple and very reliable. In the accompanying study, Finning and colleagues assess the feasibility of applying a high throughput method for predicting RhD phenotype from fetal DNA in the plasma of pregnant women who are
Sailesh Kumar, consultant in fetal and maternal medicine
1 Queen Charlottes and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS
sailesh.kumar@imperial.ac.uk
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+