Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:746 (5 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39506.495868.AD
Geoff Watts, freelance journalist
1 London
geoff@scileg.freeserve.co.uk
Money for research has tended to be compartmentalised by discipline, but, as Geoff Watts reports, one funding body is broadening its horizons
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Think of the government funding sources that underpin most UK research in medicine and health care and what comes to mind? The Medical Research Council, obviously; and, more recently, the National Institute for Health Research. But what about the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council? Readers may be surprised to learn that an organisation operating in this territory has recently identified next generation healthcare as one of its four priorities. Why this choice?
The council drew up its priorities for funding in response to a government statement setting out the key challenges now facing UK society.1 Kedar Pandya, head of the councils life sciences interface programme, is overseeing the next generation healthcare activities. One factor in the choice of theme, he says, was the governments interest in putting more emphasis on the lifelong maintenance of good health and wellbeing. Another was a consultation with the councils advisory board of senior
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.