Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:736 (5 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39535.425139.1F
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
There are many potential problems with polyclinics (or Darzis khazis, as I like to think of them), but the most obvious is the effect they could have on the environment.1 My practice operates two village surgeries, and I estimate that at least 50% of our consultations are with patients who have walked to surgery. A polyclinic combining local practices would be based about 15 km away. As we can see about 300 patients a week, this means an extra 150 car journeys of 30 km or more, which adds up to roughly 4500 km worth of CO2 per week. Replicate this around the country, and you have a figure that would make a nonsense of the governments plans to reduce emissions.
Equally irritating is the fact that, whenever they are asked, patients express a clear preference for local surgeries staffed by familiar faces who understand their hinterland. The government seems
Chris E Nancollas, GP
1 Newnham Surgery, Newnham GL14 1 BE
chrisnanco@aol.com
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.