Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336 (5 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39539.593252.47
Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
fgodlee@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A few years ago Carol Black, then president of the Royal College of Physicians, caused a media furore by saying that the growing number of women in medicine threatened the professions influence and status. As Iona Heath wrote in a BMJ editorial, this was portrayed as an astonishing position for a woman to adopt, with the clear implication that it was antifeminist (BMJ 2004:329:412-3; doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7463.412). Heath concluded that Blacks concerns were valid because of the continuing unequal status of women in society.
The proportion of women entering medicine continues to grow, and the concerns that seemed unacceptable then, especially when expressed by a woman, continue to rankle. Whether they will be more or less acceptable coming from a man we may now find out. In this weeks Head to Head, Brian McKinstry argues that there are now too many female medical graduates (p 748; doi: 10.1136/bmj.39505.491065.94).
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses