Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:693 (29 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39527.454560.59
Tessa Richards, assistant editor, BMJ
trichards@bmj.com
We must grasp the opportunity to respond to a controversial EU proposal to allow drug companies to provide information on prescription only drugs directly to the public
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
How easy is it to draw a clear line between providing information about a product and promoting it? Most of us would regard it as difficult, if not impossible. Not the European Commission, though—at least not when the product is a drug. This is evident in a new and already much criticised consultation paper on patient information (http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pharmaceuticals/index_en.htm). This paper sets out the commissions ambitious proposals to provide Europes citizens with "uniform access to understandable, objective, high quality, and non-promotional information" on drugs. Central to these plans is a move to allow manufacturers to provide information on prescription drugs directly to the public, under the "clear safeguard" that advertisement is banned. Responses to the paper are invited to help inform a draft directive that will include proposals to reform the way drugs are assessed and priced. So why the criticism?
The answer lies in the history behind the
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.