BMJ  2008;336:688-689 (29 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39526.467951.DB

News

Opening the lid on open access

¹ London

As the National Institutes of Health make open access compulsory for research they have funded, Susan Mayor looks at the policies of other funders

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The chief public funding body for medical research in the United States, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), is introducing an open access policy from next week. All papers resulting from research that it has funded will have to be made freely available to the public no later than one year after they have been published.

This is the latest policy from key research funders to promote open access to research findings (table). It is based on the argument that the public should have free access to results from research that it has funded, and researchers should have free access to papers they have written or reviewed rather than have to pay subscriptions or single access fees to journals. Open access publishing also makes research freely available to help advance research around the world.

View this table:   Open access policies

 
There are two main publishing models for open access. Researchers can publish . . . [Full text of this article]

Policies

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

US Congress and European Research Council insist on open access to research results

Jeanne Lenzer
BMJ 2008 336: 176-177. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

US passes bill granting mandatory access to data

Jeanne Lenzer
BMJ 2007 335: 906. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Open access and openly accessible: a study of scientific publications shared via the internet

Jonathan D Wren
BMJ 2005 330: 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Open access is not new

Ken Stein, et al.
bmj.com, 11 Apr 2008 [Full text]