Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:635 (22 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39521.633750.DB
Caroline White
1 London
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The new system in England to represent patients and public opinion on health and social care is poorly resourced, insufficiently independent, and unlikely to be able to exercise any real clout, claims the BMA.
In the second of its reports on the future of the NHS in England the BMA raises several concerns about local involvement networks (LINKs), which will replace patient and public involvement forums next month.
The new networks will enable commissioners, regulators, and local authorities overview and scrutiny committees to gauge public opinion on health and social care, excluding privately run NHS services. Each local authority will fund its own LINK, which will number 150
fewer than the forums they are replacing.
But this funding arrangement may compromise the networks autonomy, says the BMA. And because the funds arent ringfenced they could be diverted elsewhere. It also argues that the networks lack an overarching body to coordinate
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+