BMJ  2008;336:629 (22 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39520.521146.3A

Letters

Moving beyond depression

The researcher’s credo

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Lenzer and Brownlee hit the nail on the head regarding the important issue of data access.1 We owe all human subjects who volunteer for behavioural and medical research more than they have been getting. For years, the top scientific journals have required that all clinical trials be publicly registered before data collection begins, in order to be eligible for publication. This was an important step designed to reduce publication bias, but it did not go far enough. The recent FDA Amendments Act mandating public access to data summaries is another step in the right direction, but, as Lenzer and Brownlee say, this too may not go far enough. Several examples from the psychopharmacology literature have shown that nothing short of total public access to raw human subject data on efficacy and safety will be enough to ensure that data are independently and thoroughly evaluated.2 3 Issues of distorted or selective publication . . . [Full text of this article]

David O Antonuccio, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, David Healy, professor

1 University of Nevada School of Medicine, 401 W 2nd St, Suite 216, Reno, NV 89503, USA, 2 North Wales Department of Psychological Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff LL57 2PW

oliver2@aol.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

An untold story?
Jeanne Lenzer and Shannon Brownlee
BMJ 2008 336: 532-534. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ