Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336 (22 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39524.482535.47
Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
fgodlee@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In the documentary The English Surgeon reviewed this week (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39511.711227.3A), English surgeon Henry Marsh debates with his Ukrainian colleague whether success in medicine is about dedicating your life to saving patients or accumulating academic honours. Why should it be one or the other, I found myself asking. So Im intrigued to find this conflict between academic and clinical medicine as a subplot in our Head to Head article on metabolic syndrome (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39484.636586.94, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39477.500197.AD).
Edwin Gale, an academic clinician, argues that we should dump the syndrome because it has no clinical value. In the syndromes defence, George Alberti and P Z Zimmet, both also academic clinicians, say its value lies in its ease of use in primary care. Gale says it has spawned a flourishing academic industry but is hardly used by practising clinicians. Alberti and Zimmet characterise the syndromes critics as living in a
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses