Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:558-559 (8 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39504.409329.AD
Nicholas J Talley, professor of medicine and epidemiology1
1 Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32082, USA
talley.nicholas@mayo.edu
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The NICE guidelines summarise the diagnosis and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but several issues remain contentious.
The NICE guidelines offer a pragmatic definition of IBS, similar to one published in 2002 by the American College of Gastroenterology Taskforce.1 However, the utility of these pragmatic definitions is unknown. The Rome criteria for IBS were developed for research purposes and are specific, but there are no adequate validation data documenting their applicability in primary care.1 2 The NICE guidelines suggest that symptoms that are made worse by eating support a diagnosis of IBS, but as acknowledged in the guidelines, this is based on expert consensus rather than research evidence. Clinicians need to be aware that this symptom may lead to confusion with functional dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease. Making a positive diagnosis of IBS seems reasonable, but the approach applied still is largely based on expert opinion, not high quality evidence.
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.