Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:536-538 (8 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39469.432118.AD
Stephen Gillam, consultant in public health
1 Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 2SR
sjg67@medschl.cam.ac.uk
Thirty years after WHO highlighted the importance of primary health carein tackling health inequality in every country, Stephen Gillam reflects on the reasons for slow progress and the implications for todays health systems
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
After years of relative neglect, the World Health Organization has recently given strategic prominence to the development of primary health care. This year sees the 30th anniversary of the declaration of Alma Ata (box 1). Convened by WHO and the United Nations Childrens Fund (Unicef), the Alma Ata conference drew representatives from 134 countries, 67 international organisations, and many non-governmental organisations. (China was notably absent.) Primary health care "based on practical, scientifically sound and socially acceptable methods and technology made universally accessible through peoples full participation and at a cost that the community and country can afford" was to be the key to delivering health for all by the year 2000.1 Primary health care in this context includes both primary medical care and activities tackling determinants of ill health.
|
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.