Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:519-520 (8 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39472.451134.80
New UK test claims to be fair but lacks rigorous scientific evaluation
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Recently, the Department of Work and Pensions in the United Kingdom announced a renewal of the personal capacity assessment. The report states that the renewal is expected to result in 20 000 fewer people claiming sickness benefits each year. It also claims that the new test is more robust, accurate, and fair than the previous one.1
Two issues are at stake here: firstly, the provision of work and a decent income for millions of people with disabilities and, secondly, the billions of pounds that society is willing and able to pay in disability benefits.In many European countries, the growing numbers of people claiming disability benefit and expenditure on these benefits is an important point of political interest.2
The personal capacity assessment lists 17 activities, each of which can be given a score according to the degree of limitation. People with a score of 15 or more are assessed as unable
Jos Verbeek, occupational physician1, Frank van Dijk, occupational physician2
1 Cochrane Occupational Health Field, Knowledge Transfer Team, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Kuopio, Finland, 2 Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
j.h.verbeek@amc.uva.nl
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.