Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:508 (1 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39503.459572.59
George Moncrieff, general practitioner, Oxfordshire
georgemoncrieff@hotmail.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Everyone agrees that the United Kingdoms state benefit system is in a mess. The cost to the taxpayer has escalated out of control, and the annual bill is now in excess of £13bn (
17bn; $26bn). The public are outraged by stories of malingering and inappropriate claims, and the government has appointed Carol Black, as national director for health and work, to investigate alternatives to the current flawed system.
Most GPs would like to be removed from their current central role in signing patients off work—not because we are lazy, but because we recognise that it is impossible to be the patients advocate on health matters at the same time as being responsible for deciding whether they are entitled to incapacity benefit. Furthermore, most of us have no experience of occupational health and really know little more about our patients work environments than anyone else. Instead of policing the system
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses