Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:504 (1 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39496.451898.AD
Nicola Dalbeth, rheumatologist and senior lecturer1, Bruce Arroll, professor and head of department2
1 Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand, 2 Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland
Correspondence to: Bruce Arroll b.arroll@auckland.ac.nz
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The major focus of the guideline is management of established pain and disability in patients with existing osteoarthritis. It raises several conundrums for clinicians. Firstly, it identifies as core treatments those that are low risk and low cost. However, these treatments are also generally low in efficacy with low or negligible effect sizes.1 Of the core treatments, only exercise therapy has a moderate effect size for treating pain in osteoarthritis, which is similar to the effect size of the more risky and costly oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Although these core treatments should be integrated into osteoarthritis management, in clinical practice they are rarely sufficient as sole treatments. Furthermore, many patients with osteoarthritis do not adhere to long term exercise programmes.2 Analysis of patient acceptability of the guidelines core interventions would be of great interest.
Secondly, the inclusion of topical NSAIDs as a preferable pharmacological treatment for hand and knee
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.