Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:463 (1 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39500.453623.1F
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
I think that the (correct) gist of the rapid responses to Hams editorial is that Hams prescription is one for preposterous revisionism.1 He talks of "leadership," but he and his (political, health economist) ilk have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams in emasculating and proletarianising the medical profession. A brief perusal of the authors many publications offers a handy history of how the medical profession has been recently vilified, marginalised, and ultimately disempowered.
The Modernising Medical Careers catastrophe, General Medical Council and Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board "reforms," and political control through targets and imposed contract settlements (in the teeth of sustained opposition) mean that doctors are now for the most part demoralised technicians or part time professionals.
The great future of medical leadership is all behind us, Professor Ham, and for health economists or pundits to suggest otherwise is disingenuous indeed.
Chris Luke, consultant in emergency medicine
1 Cork University Hospital, Cork, Republic of Ireland
cluke@muh.ie
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care