Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:455 (1 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39496.556435.80 (published 22 February 2008)
Higher alcohol taxes and restricting availability are more likely to succeed than partnerships with industry
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Nations, like people, can develop a pathological pattern of alcohol misuse. Ever since the Blair government consolidated its alcohol control policy around a "partnership" with the alcohol drinks industry,1 the United Kingdom has been anything but united about how to deal with the nations alcohol problems.2 3 While some people have seen collaboration with industry as a way of "disabling the public interest,"2 the ostensible rationale was to involve alcohol producers and retailers in new initiatives—such as voluntary limits on advertising, safer packaging, and codes of good conduct—to make town centres safer at night. In response to mounting evidence that this approach is not working,3 this week the BMA voices its opinion on how the problem should be tackled through the release of a report on alcohol misuse.4
According to the report the long wave of increasing alcohol consumption—which has moved the UK into eighth position in the hard drinking nations
Thomas F Babor, professor and chairman
1 Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 06030-6325, USA
babor@nso.uchc.edu
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+