Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:418-419 (23 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39491.469005.94
Andrew Jack, pharmaceuticals correspondent
1 Financial Times, London
Andrew.Jack@ft.com
With patents running out on their big earning products and recent scandals undermining their image, drug companies are under pressure. Andrew Jack reports on their problems
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
When business chief executives joined politicians and public officials gathered at the World Economic Forum in Davos last month, one group of industry leaders was noticeably under-represented: those from the pharmaceutical sector. Some regulars in previous years, such as Hank McKinnell, the outspoken former head of Pfizer, the worlds largest drug group, have lost their jobs. Others, like Richard Clark from Merck and Daniel Vasella from Novartis, pulled out at the last minute. The message was clear. At a time of investor dissatisfaction with their companies and employee disgruntlement at cutbacks, they would do better to stay in their headquarters and focus on internal problems rather than debate the broader issues of the world.
To many, it seems hard to believe that the drug industry - long spoilt by lavish revenues and little need for controls on spending - is in crisis. In fact, its current malaise is characterised by
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+