Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:406 (23 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39493.435556.1F
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Donner-Banzhoff and Sönnichsen highlight the lack of evidence for "treating to target" with statins.1 Treatment targets can lead to an escalation of treatment that is not evidence based, drain clinical resources through repeat clinic visits and blood tests, and can lead to the unnecessary use of branded statins, which bring no additional benefit to the patient and are at least 13 times more expensive than generic statins.2
However, Donner-Banzhoff and Sönnichsen have oversimplified the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) advice on statins. The SIGN guideline differs from other guidance in the United Kingdom: it does not recommend treatment targets for statins in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.3 It uses the findings of Haywards exploration of statin treatment targets4 to note that current clinical evidence does not show that lipid treatment should be titrated to achieve proposed low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol targets. The only treatment target mentioned in the SIGN
D Graham Mackenzie, consultant in public health medicine, Philip Rutledge, consultant in medicines management
1 NHS Lothian, Edinburgh EH8 9RS
gm@nhs.net