Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:405-406 (23 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39493.439421.1F
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Fudge et al report that users were not involved in defining categories or criteria for their involvement in the stroke programme on which this published ethnography is based.1
In our experience, user involvement, and research about user involvement, requires and benefits from a participatory approach.2 This fosters congruence between the intentions of the work and the methods used. For our participatory research project we used a peer research model involving refugees and asylum seekers in Irish primary care.3
Five community representatives were active from the outset in shaping the research aims and objectives, co-designing research materials, doing fieldwork, and co-analysing collected data. The community representatives also defined criteria for evaluating their involvement.
They characterise their involvement as transformative for themselves and the wider community. They describe themselves as mediators and speak of themselves as a link between worlds of the Irish health service and their local networks. They say that
Anne MacFarlane, lecturer in primary care1, Mary OReilly-de Brún, director2, Tomas de Brún, director2
1 Department of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland, 2 Centre for Participatory Strategies, Clonbur, Galway
anne.macfarlane@nuigalway.ie