BMJ  2008;336:404-405 (23 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39493.404722.1F

Letters

Does cot death still exist?

SIDS is not a disease entity

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is not a disease entity.1 It is a description of an outcome, a term used to acknowledge a failure to make a diagnosis. The value of the term is that it informs us that no blame is apportioned to the carer. The weakness is that it implies that we understand more than we do. The new term SUDI, or sudden unexpected death in infancy, is unfortunate in that it would have been better if the U stood for "unexplained" rather than "unexpected."

It is important to understand that while parents are usually blameless for the death, they may still be partly responsible. For example, a whole generation of parents laid their babies face down in the cot, believing that they were doing the best. If the parents have contributed to the cause of death we do them a disservice by not saying so.

We . . . [Full text of this article]

Leonard H P Williams, consultant paediatrician

1 Bassetlaw District General Hospital, Worksop S81 0BD

leonard.williams@dbh.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Does cot death still exist?
Jonathan Gornall
BMJ 2008 336: 302-304. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ