Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:397-398 (23 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39461.616991.80 (published 12 February 2008)
Can reliably estimate the probability of outcomes for groups but not for individuals
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Hippocrates is said to have remarked in 400 BC that "No head injury is too severe to despair of, nor too trivial to ignore." While this prognostic scheme achieves absolute accuracy, its precision leaves something to be desired. More recently, many groups have attempted to produce more detailed risk adjustment models for predicting outcome in traumatic brain injury. In 2006, a systematic review concluded that most predictive models were inadequately validated, poorly presented, and based on studies from single centres with small samples that excluded patients from low income countries (where traumatic brain injury is most common).1 In the accompanying paper, the Medical Research Council CRASH Trial Collaborators provide a series of prognostic models that attempt to remedy these shortcomings.2
Their models were developed on clinical data from the 10 008 patients recruited to a trial of corticosteroids in traumatic brain injury.3 4 Separate variants of the models allow the option
David Menon, professor of anaesthesia1, David Harrison, senior statistician2
1 Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, 2 Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London WC1H 9HR
dkm13@wbic.cam.ac.uk