BMJ  2008;336:397-398 (23 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39461.616991.80 (published 12 February 2008)

Editorials

Prognostic modelling in traumatic brain injury

Can reliably estimate the probability of outcomes for groups but not for individuals

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Hippocrates is said to have remarked in 400 BC that "No head injury is too severe to despair of, nor too trivial to ignore." While this prognostic scheme achieves absolute accuracy, its precision leaves something to be desired. More recently, many groups have attempted to produce more detailed risk adjustment models for predicting outcome in traumatic brain injury. In 2006, a systematic review concluded that most predictive models were inadequately validated, poorly presented, and based on studies from single centres with small samples that excluded patients from low income countries (where traumatic brain injury is most common).¹ In the accompanying paper, the Medical Research Council CRASH Trial Collaborators provide a series of prognostic models that attempt to remedy these shortcomings.²

Their models were developed on clinical data from the 10 008 patients recruited to a trial of corticosteroids in traumatic brain injury.^{3 4} Separate variants of the models allow the option . . . [Full text of this article]

¹ Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, ² Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London WC1H 9HR

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Prognosis and politics

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2008 336: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients

MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators
BMJ 2008 336: 425-429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care

Nick Black
BMJ 1996 312: 1215-1218. [Extract] [Full Text]