Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336 (23 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39497.574525.DE
Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
fgodlee@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Given how common head injuries are, its surprising how little we know about their prognosis. But help is at hand. Based on their MRC CRASH trial, Pablo Perel and colleagues have produced new prognostic models for patients with traumatic brain injury (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39461.643438.25). An editorial explains that better understanding of prognosis will not only improve clinical care but will help us design better clinical trials (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39461.616991.80).
Improving prognosis almost always means rapid diagnosis and effective treatment. Two conditions where this is especially important are acute myocardial infarction and severe sepsis. Christian Juhl Terkelsen and Jens Flensted Lassen conclude that we need more centres that deal with large numbers of cases if we are to get "door to balloon" times down to 30 minutes for people with ST elevation myocardial infarction (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39475.482419.80). Jane Minton and colleagues sought to cut delays in starting effective treatment for bloodstream
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.