Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:349 (16 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39486.688356.DB
David Spurgeon
1 Quebec
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The failure of the United States to contain medical costs, which now exceed $2.1 trillion (£1.1 trillion;
1.4 trillion) a year or more than $7000 for every man, woman, and child in the country, results primarily from the unique and pervasive commercialisation of the sector, an article in this weeks New England Journal of Medicine says (2008;358:549-51).
Inthe perspective article Robert Kuttner, coeditor of the magazine The American Prospect and a senior fellow at Demos, a public policy research and advocacy organisation based in New York, contends that what raises costs and distorts resource allocation are "the dominance of for-profit insurance and pharmaceutical companies, a new wave of investor-owned specialty hospitals, and profit-maximising behaviour even by nonprofit players."
He continues: "Profits, billing, marketing, and the gratuitous costs of private bureaucracies siphon off $400 billion to $500 billion of the $2.1 trillion spent, but the more serious and less appreciated syndrome
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.