BMJ  2008;336:344 (16 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39486.488993.3A

Letters

Measuring patient care

PROMs promote health gain and patient involvement

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Hawkes seems to have swallowed the paternalistic line that what doctors do to patients is more important than the outcome as perceived by them.1 How can we know if a process brings benefits and continues to improve it without measuring the outcome, and how can we rely on process alone when the evidence shows such widespread variation and inconsistency in process in clinical practice? For patients, there is much more to success than alive or dead. How often have we heard: "They said my hip replacement went well, but I am now housebound" or "He says I have a good flow rate in my bypass graft, but I still get pain at 10 metres"?

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), unlike most of the other clinical measures used traditionally (readmissions, infection rates, adverse incidents, etc), usually measure health gain—what actually happens to most patients who interface with the healthcare system. BUPA . . . [Full text of this article]

Andrew J Vallance-Owen, group medical director

1 BUPA, London WC1A 2BA

vallanca@bupa.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

How do we get the measure of patient care?
Nigel Hawkes
BMJ 2008 336: 249. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ