Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:344 (16 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39486.488993.3A
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Hawkes seems to have swallowed the paternalistic line that what doctors do to patients is more important than the outcome as perceived by them.1 How can we know if a process brings benefits and continues to improve it without measuring the outcome, and how can we rely on process alone when the evidence shows such widespread variation and inconsistency in process in clinical practice? For patients, there is much more to success than alive or dead. How often have we heard: "They said my hip replacement went well, but I am now housebound" or "He says I have a good flow rate in my bypass graft, but I still get pain at 10 metres"?
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), unlike most of the other clinical measures used traditionally (readmissions, infection rates, adverse incidents, etc), usually measure health gain—what actually happens to most patients who interface with the healthcare system. BUPA
Andrew J Vallance-Owen, group medical director
1 BUPA, London WC1A 2BA
vallanca@bupa.com