Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:343 (16 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39486.498866.3A
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Gates et al conclude that the evidence base is weak for the effectiveness of multifactorial interventions to prevent falls in primary care, the community, and emergency care.1 However, the 19 studies they reviewed are not all trials of multifactorial assessments and targeted interventions.
These 19 trials require sorting into three more clinically relevant groups: those that are not truly multifactorial (three), those entailing assessment and referral but no direct intervention (10), and those entailing multifactorial assessment and direct intervention (six).
Analysed in this way, four of the six trials in the more important third group are either clearly positive or had a favourable risk ratio but insufficient power, and only two were negative. Seven of the 10 trials of assessment and referral, but without direct intervention, were negative. In one of the three trials of physical therapy, falls were not a primary or secondary outcome measure, so it should not
Barney S Spivack, medical director
1 LifeCare, Shelton, CT 06484, USA
bspivack@lifecare.com
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.