Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:337-338 (16 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39456.470880.80 (published 29 January 2008)
Despite undoubted progress, we still have much to do
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Despite advances in prevention, acute care, and rehabilitation the prognosis after acute stroke remains poor: 20-30% of patients die within a month and 13% of survivors are discharged to institutional care.1 2 In the accompanying prospective cohort study, Bruin Slot and colleagues report that functional status at six months after stroke is associated with long term survival.3 The median survival of patients who were independent at this stage was 9.7 years compared with 6.0 years for those who were dependent. The effect of functional outcome at six months on mortality was independent of age and stroke subtype. The study gives no details about the causes of death or whether secondary prevention was optimised, but these survival data again emphasise the impact of stroke. They also suggest that early treatment known to reduce dependency at six months may have a substantial longer term effect.
Stroke care and the evidence base on which
Helen Rodgers, reader in stroke medicine1, Richard Thomson, professor of epidemiology and public health2
1 Clinical Medical Sciences, Newcastle University Medical School NE2 4HH, 2 Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University Medical School
richard.thomson@ncl.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses