BMJ 2008;336:299 (9 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39482.496725.DB
News
Circumcision of men did not cut HIV transmission to their wives
Bob Roehr
1 Boston
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Voluntary circumcision of men reduced their acquisition of herpes simplex virus by about 25% and cut in half the rate of ulcerative genital diseases, primarily herpes, among their wives. But disappointingly, among those men who were HIV positive, circumcision did not seem to affect the rate of transmission of HIV to their wives.
The study was part of broad ongoing population research being conducted in the rural Rakai region of Uganda as part of an almost 20 year collaboration between local and US investigators. It was presented this week at the 15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections.
Three earlier studies conducted in Uganda, Kenya, and South Africa had shown that men who became circumcised reduced their risk of acquiring HIV infection by more than half.
"For us, it stands right up with prevention of mother to child transmission as an intervention that really can work," said the Johns Hopkins
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This Article
- Full text
- Respond to this article
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when responses are posted
- Alert me when a correction is posted
Services
- Email this article to a friend
- Find similar articles in BMJ
- Find similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Related Content
Bookmark with
What's new
Latest blogs and video
Services
Tools
Online poll
Resources
Rapid responses for this article
There are no rapid responses for this article.Most read
Print issues
Student BMJ
Asylum seekers' care
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care
