BMJ  2008;336:231-232 (2 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39472.527940.3A

Letters

Open letter to the GMC

How many doctors are referred for child protection work?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Catto’s analysis (previous letter) in response to Wheatley’s open letter needs comment.1 He must accept that the GMC’s decision about Meadow was incorrect. The High Court overturned the GMC’s decision, stating that the GMC’s judgment "approached the irrational." The Court of Appeal confirmed the High Court’s action.2 Perhaps Catto would like to state that it was the GMC that erred.

Some readers may not realise that the eight paediatricians that Catto says were referred to the fitness to practise procedures were only a fraction of those actually referred to the GMC. The fitness to practise procedure is not the start of the GMC process but is a hurdle along the route. It would be useful if Catto told us exactly how many senior paediatricians had been referred to the GMC because of their work in child protection. A survey by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health in 2004 . . . [Full text of this article]

Leonard H P Williams, consultant paediatrician

1 Bassetlaw District General Hospital, Worksop S81 0BD

leonard.williams@dbh.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

How to investigate complaints
David M B Hall
BMJ 2008 336: 231. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

GMC’s reply
Graeme Catto
BMJ 2008 336: 231. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

GMC statement does not reflect actions
John Bridson
BMJ 2008 336: 232. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Open letter to the General Medical Council
R Wheatley
BMJ 2007 335: 1265. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ