BMJ  2008;336:174 (26 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.39465.508634.3A

Letters

The treatment paradox

Not necessarily ...

The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below.

Spence says that an individual patient, despite many years of investment in taking statins, gets virtually nil health benefit.1 This is not necessarily so. Clinical trials cannot determine if the benefit is confined to a few individuals or distributed among many. Statins might prevent (or delay) cardiovascular death in a handful of those who take them, or they might slightly reduce the risk in everyone who takes them.

To use an analogy, wearing thermal underwear in winter might prevent death due to hypothermia in only a few, but the benefit of keeping warm would be felt by many.

No conflict of interest is declared, as I do not take statins or wear thermal underwear.

Norman R Williams, clinical trial co-ordinator

1 Clinical Trials Group of the Department of Surgery, UCL Archway Campus, London N19 5LW

n.williams@ctg.ucl.ac.uk


Competing interests: None declared.

  1. Spence D. The treatment paradox. BMJ 2008;336:100. (12 January.) doi:10.1136/bmj.39454.622824.94[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

The treatment paradox
Des Spence
BMJ 2008 336: 100. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ