Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:160 (19 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.39461.484132.59
Des Spence, general practitioner, Glasgow
destwo@yahoo.co.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
I once owned a Soviet Lada Riva—it seemed like a good deal. The mats didnt fit, it skidded at 10 mph going round corners, and, for a car built for the Siberian wastes, it never started in the cold. But it was a good way to meet my neighbours, who helped to push it every morning. One day an engine fire blazed my Lada to Valhalla, despite regular servicing check ups and an MOT test. I was glad.
Gordon Brown, our new politburo boss, has promised a revolution of American-style screening "check ups" (BMJ 2008;336:62-3; doi: 10.1136/bmj.39454.738912.4E). Should we recalcitrant general practitioners resist this centralised diktat, then private sector workers are on standby to be bused across our picket lines. For screening is a simply a good idea, isnt it? Detect a life threatening disease early, treat it early, and save lives. The popular media have long bemoaned
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+