Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:1272-1273 (22 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39420.432951.80
Scrap development aid as we know it and give the money to independent pro-poor aid organisations
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Poverty is acknowledged to be the biggest risk for ill health worldwide. The World Health Organization estimates that about 1.2 billion people live in extreme poverty, without decent shelter, clean water, adequate sanitation, or sufficient food.1 The response of the rich nations to global poverty has been to wave the magic wand of development aid, also known as "official development assistance," which distinguishes it fromad hocassistance for emergencies such as natural disasters. Development aid is meant to help eradicate poverty through the stimulation of economic growth.
A total of $2.3 trillion (£1.1 trillion;
1.6 trillion) has been spent on development aid over past five decades, and it has been the subject of vigorous debate among development economists. Three books have emerged on the subject in the past two years—The Bottom Billion by Paul Collier, The White Mans Burden by William Easterly, and The End of Poverty by Jeffrey Sacks.234
Dan J Ncayiyana, emeritus vice chancellor and professor
1 Durban Institute of Technology, Durban 4000, South Africa
danjn@telkomsa.net
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.