BMJ 2007;335:1265 (15 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39427.640069.DE
Views & reviews
Open letter to the General Medical Council
R Wheatley, consultant community paediatrician, designated doctor for child protection
1 Child Development and Family Support Centre, Blackpool
Dr.Wheatley@bfwhospitals.nhs.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Dear Professor Catto
I am writing to you as a designated doctor for child protection. As part of my responsibilities I am required to offer advice and guidance to doctors within my area about child protection matters. Unfortunately, in the light of the recent verdict against Professor David Southall, I feel I cannot fulfil that role responsibly; to do so would put both my and their registration at peril. We urgently need guidance.
I have struggled through the available transcripts of the 33 day hearing which culminated in this judgment. The judgment found that David Southall had inappropriately accused a mother of murdering her 10 year old child. Much of the case hinges on a complaint made by a Mrs "M." As you are doubtless aware, there have been many such complaints made over the years against Dr Southall, almost all of which are linked to an energetic and committed, . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Three doctors and a GMC prosecution
- Jonathan Gornall
BMJ 2008 337: a907.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
How to investigate complaints
- David M B Hall
BMJ 2008 336: 231.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
GMCs reply
- Graeme Catto
BMJ 2008 336: 231.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
How many doctors are referred for child protection work?
- Leonard H P Williams
BMJ 2008 336: 231-232.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
GMC statement does not reflect actions
- John Bridson
BMJ 2008 336: 232.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Gornall, J.
(2008). Three doctors and a GMC prosecution. BMJ
337: a907-a907
[Full text]
-
Hall, D. M B
(2008). How to investigate complaints. BMJ
336: 231-231
[Full text]
-
Bridson, J.
(2008). GMC statement does not reflect actions. BMJ
336: 232-232
[Full text]
-
Catto, G.
(2008). GMC's reply. BMJ
336: 231-231
[Full text]
-
Williams, L. H P
(2008). How many doctors are referred for child protection work?. BMJ
336: 231-232
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Professor Southall should appeal and we should support him.
- ted willis
bmj.com, 15 Dec 2007
[Full text]
- Proof
- B Mucci
bmj.com, 19 Dec 2007
[Full text]
- Unfair Decision by GMC
- Jerold F. Lucey
bmj.com, 22 Dec 2007
[Full text]
- read the transcripts...
- David Bell
bmj.com, 24 Dec 2007
[Full text]
- How to investigate complaints
- David M B Hall
bmj.com, 23 Dec 2007
[Full text]
- The Transcripts exonorate Southall
- Robert Wheatley
bmj.com, 27 Dec 2007
[Full text]
- Spin doctors
- Penny Mellor
bmj.com, 7 Jan 2008
[Full text]
- Are we reading the same transcripts ???
- david bell
bmj.com, 28 Dec 2007
[Full text]
- Further reading
- John M Bridson
bmj.com, 30 Dec 2007
[Full text]
- Re: Are we reading the same transcripts ???
- Robert Wheatley
bmj.com, 31 Dec 2007
[Full text]
- Response to open letter
- Professor Sir Graeme Catto, et al.
bmj.com, 17 Jan 2008
[Full text]
- Re: Response to open letter
- Penny Mellor
bmj.com, 19 Jan 2008
[Full text]
- Re: Response to open letter
- leonard h p Williams
bmj.com, 20 Jan 2008
[Full text]
- Less Than One Percent
- Brian Morgan
bmj.com, 20 Jan 2008
[Full text]
- Re: Re: Response to open letter
- William G Pickering
bmj.com, 21 Jan 2008
[Full text]
- Response to Professor Catto
- John Bridson, et al.
bmj.com, 24 Jan 2008
[Full text]
- Re: Response to Professor Catto
- Penny Mellor
bmj.com, 29 Jan 2008
[Full text]
- Re: Response to Professor Catto
- William G Pickering
bmj.com, 25 Jan 2008
[Full text]
- Re: Re: Response to Professor Catto
- Jonathan R. James
bmj.com, 27 Jan 2008
[Full text]
- GMC-is it fit to practise
- james f kirwan
bmj.com, 8 Feb 2008
[Full text]
- the GMC's analysis of the transcripts is vindicated in the court of appeal
- david bell
bmj.com, 26 May 2009
[Full text]
- Re: the GMC's analysis of the transcripts is vindicated in the court of appeal
- Penny Mellor
bmj.com, 27 May 2009
[Full text]
- A reply for Mr Bell
- Rob Wheatley
bmj.com, 29 May 2009
[Full text]
- A question for Dr Wheatley
- Penny Mellor
bmj.com, 29 May 2009
[Full text]
- The High Court judgement
- david bell
bmj.com, 2 Jun 2009
[Full text]