BMJ  2007;335:1223-1224 (15 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39421.544063.BE

Editorials

Assuring the confidentiality of shared electronic health records

Sharing data between multiple institutions offers better regulation and public protection

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The recent loss of sensitive data on 25 million people by the government of the United Kingdom is just the latest in a series of events covering a wide variety of institutions in different countries.1 2 Media coverage has tended to focus on obvious aspects of the unintended release of personal data, such as the disks that were lost and omissions in procedure, such as encryption.3 The most important question in all of these scandals, however, is how a single failure or lapse in procedure could result in a catastrophic disclosure.

The consequences of these security failures are exacerbated by our increasing tendency to centralise large and detailed data from multiple sources, and the existence of policies and legislation that enable the sharing of data between organisations. In health care, the collection and storage of sensitive personal data is essential for delivering a high quality clinical service and for research.4 Indeed, . . . [Full text of this article]

Mark McGilchrist, senior research fellow 1, Frank Sullivan, professor of research and development in general practice and primary care1, Dipak Kalra, clinical senior lecturer in health informatics, director 2

1 Health Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee DD2 4BF , 2 Centre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional Education, University College London, London N19 5LW

m.m.mcgilchrist@dundee.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Let’s put worry about computer security into perspective
J E F Fitzgerald, A Nikkar-Esfahani, A A B Jamjoom, K K Shah, and A G Acheson
BMJ 2008 336: 1452-1453. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Time for an NHS smart card?
Prasanna de Silva
BMJ 2008 336: 9. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

For patients' sake, don't boycott e-health records
Marlene Winfield
BMJ 2007 335: 158. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Confidentiality of personal health information used for research
Dipak Kalra, Renate Gertz, Peter Singleton, and Hazel M Inskip
BMJ 2006 333: 196-198. [Full Text] [PDF]

Policing access to primary care with identity cards
Julian Sheather and Iona Heath
BMJ 2004 329: 303-304. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ure, J., Rakebrandt, F., Lloyd, S., Khanban, A., Procter, R., Anderson, S., Hanley, J., Hartswood, M., Pagliari, C., McKinstry, B., Tarling, A., Kidd, G., Corscadden, P. (2009). Giving Them Something to Hate: Using Prototypes as a Vehicle for Early Engagement in Virtual Organizations. Social Science Computer Review 27: 569-582 [Abstract]  
  • Fitzgerald, J E F, Nikkar-Esfahani, A, Jamjoom, A A B, Shah, K K, Acheson, A G (2008). Let's put worry about computer security into perspective. BMJ 336: 1452-1453 [Full text]  
  • Silva, P. d. (2008). Time for an NHS smart card?. BMJ 336: 9-9 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Paternalism versus Patient Autonomy, Responsibility and Choice
Prasanna de Silva
bmj.com, 17 Dec 2007 [Full text]
Media beat-up: EHR and security
Alec Holt
bmj.com, 19 Dec 2007 [Full text]
Data Protection: the reality gap.
Gee Yen Shin
bmj.com, 2 Jan 2008 [Full text]
Consumers are the Key
Prajesh N Chhanabhai
bmj.com, 6 Mar 2008 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ