Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:1220-1221 (15 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39392.353090.80 (published 4 December 2007)
Arthroplasty improves function and has a lower reoperation rate than internal fixation
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Displaced fracture of the intracapsular proximal femur has been termed the "unsolved fracture" because it is unclear whether it should be treated by internal fixation or by replacement of the femoral head with an artificial hip (arthroplasty).1 More than a third of fixed fractures will require revision surgery for either redisplacement (a complication of fracture healing), fracture non-union, or avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Arthroplasty, however, is a more extensive surgical procedure and may cause dislocation, loosening, and peri-prosthetic fracture, which together have an overall incidence of 5-15%. In their randomised controlled trial in this weeks BMJ, Frihagen and colleagues compare the effects of internal fixation or bipolar hemiarthroplasty after displaced fracture of the femoral neck.
Numerous reports of case series and some methodologically weak randomised controlled trials have failed to resolve the question of which treatment is best, and different surgeons tend to favour one or the
Martyn Parker, research fellow
1 Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough PE3 6DA
martyn.parker@pbh-tr.nhs.uk