Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:1114 (1 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39412.508993.94
Susan Mayor
London
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Targeted screening of particular groups for open angle glaucoma would be more cost effective than testing the general population, a UK modelling study concludes.
The study compared different strategies for screening for open angle glaucoma (the commonest type of glaucoma, which is the leading cause of irreversible blindness) by reviewing the existing research evidence for effectiveness and cost effectiveness.
One strategy was for a glaucoma screening technician to measure intraocular pressure and then do a second test from a range of possible tests to screen people considered to be at risk of open angle glaucoma. The United Kingdom doesn't currently have glaucoma screening technicians, but the researchers assumed that staff could be trained and accredited in a similar way to retinal screening technicians who screen for diabetic retinopathy.
A second potential strategy—which costs more—involved patients at high risk being invited to be assessed by a glaucoma optometrist.
Positive results of
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+