Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:1109-1110 (1 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39409.417188.BE
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The study by Roberts et al of mortality among patients in hospital for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has several limitations.1
Firstly, the observation that patients with IBD undergoing elective colectomy had lower mortality than those treated medically or needing emergency colectomy is not "strong evidence suggesting that the threshold for elective colectomy is too high." Patients who electively undergo colectomy usually have chronic relapsing disease or risk of malignancy, whereas those admitted to hospital for medical management or emergency colectomy are usually far sicker with severe acute or fulminant disease.2 These subgroups of patients have entirely different indications for colectomy, so lowering the threshold for elective surgery would not necessarily reduce numbers being admitted with severe acute disease.
Secondly, the authors' method of risk adjustment for comorbidity is flawed given the poor accuracy and completeness of secondary medical diagnostic coding in the hospital episode statistics database.3 Furthermore, their risk model
Muhammad F Dawwas, specialist registrar
Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ
drdawwas@gmail.com