Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:1061 (24 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39402.572685.BE
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The idea that the availability of drugs creates addicts is rubbish and backs up the panoply of sanctions that support the present law.1 2
Most people accept that government is responsible for preventing the actions of some people harming others. Thus, we can harm ourselves by smoking, drinking, and overeating, but unless these habits damage others the law is indifferent, and rightly so. Laws arbitrarily criminalising the ingestion of some substances are illogical and discriminatory. Another government responsibility is to ensure that all available drugs are clean, relatively safe, licensed, and strictly controlled. Illegal drugs absolve government from this responsibility. Thus, the effects of the illegal filthy brown heroin and the sharing of "gear" in prisons (where there is still no needle exchange) is nobody's responsibility.
Our heroin addicts are a pretty docile lot, who cause little mayhem compared with alcohol users, but the harm caused to them—HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis
Roger L Weeks, general practitioner
London SW14 7DF
roger@safescript.org