BMJ  2007;335:1061 (24 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39402.572685.BE

Letters

Should drugs be decriminalised?

Try a little compassion

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The idea that the availability of drugs creates addicts is rubbish and backs up the panoply of sanctions that support the present law.1 2

Most people accept that government is responsible for preventing the actions of some people harming others. Thus, we can harm ourselves by smoking, drinking, and overeating, but unless these habits damage others the law is indifferent, and rightly so. Laws arbitrarily criminalising the ingestion of some substances are illogical and discriminatory. Another government responsibility is to ensure that all available drugs are clean, relatively safe, licensed, and strictly controlled. Illegal drugs absolve government from this responsibility. Thus, the effects of the illegal filthy brown heroin and the sharing of "gear" in prisons (where there is still no needle exchange) is nobody's responsibility.

Our heroin addicts are a pretty docile lot, who cause little mayhem compared with alcohol users, but the harm caused to them—HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis . . . [Full text of this article]

Roger L Weeks, general practitioner

London SW14 7DF

roger@safescript.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Should drugs be decriminalised? Yes
Kailash Chand
BMJ 2007 335: 966. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Should drugs be decriminalised? No
Joseph A Califano, Jr
BMJ 2007 335: 967. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ