Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:1020 (17 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39398.601655.59
Uwe E Reinhardt, James Madison professor of political economy, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
reinhard@princeton.edu
Health professionals' benevolence has enabled politicians to resist moving the United States to a fully universal system of health insurance
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity, but to their self-love," wrote Adam Smith famously in The Wealth of Nations, laying the intellectual foundation for the assumed benevolence of free markets. The argument was that, in a properly structured, competitive market, the supplier of a good or service, although intending only his own gain, is "led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention . . . By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it."
Had Adam Smith lived to observe the political economy of 21st century America's health care, he may well have stood his famous dictum on its
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+