BMJ  2007;335:949 (10 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39315.580637.BE

Editorials

Surgery for disc disease

New evidence supports its use in selected patients

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Spinal surgeons have striven to underwrite their surgical practice by sound evidence from clinical trials, yet data of adequate quality have not always been available. This has led to clinical dilemmas with respect to the simplest of questions, such as when should surgery be recommended for acute disc prolapse and, in degenerative disc disease, whether surgery is more effective than extended non-operative treatments? Recent trials answer these questions.

The authors of the 2007 Cochrane review of surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse¹ conclude that surgical discectomy for carefully selected people with sciatica provides faster relief from the acute attack than conservative management. However, it was unclear whether surgery had any positive or negative effects on the natural history of the underlying disc disease. This conclusion was based primarily on one unblinded study published in 1983,² in which around a quarter of people treated conservatively crossed over to surgery (although there . . . [Full text of this article]

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SU

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Early surgery for relief of sciatic pain

Garth Robertson
bmj.com, 26 Nov 2007 [Full text]

Surgery for Disc Disease

Keith Bush
bmj.com, 28 Nov 2007 [Full text]

Is Surgery really necessary for disc prolapses?

Alasdair Jacks
bmj.com, 28 Nov 2007 [Full text]

early surgery for sciatica

Judith M Neaves
bmj.com, 29 Nov 2007 [Full text]

Epidural steroids in acute sciatica

Michael F Vagg
bmj.com, 29 Nov 2007 [Full text]