BMJ  2007;335:900 (3 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39381.514780.BE

Letters

Talk of psychosocial factors

Tell the whole story

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Goldacre says he sounded like an ass when explaining the complex pathogenesis of back pain on radio, but he is unduly harsh on himself.1 His message is not wrong, and he is not an ass. However, the message might have been better gift wrapped.

Western medicine is based on the biomedical model. This model is reductionist—all symptoms can be explained by underlying pathology—and dualist—if there is no pathology, it's all in your head. This model was drilled into us at medical school and is the principal model for the National Health Service. Society largely accepts the model too.

But it's wrong. For up to 90% of people presenting to their general practitioner with genuine physical symptoms, the symptoms are not explained by pathology. It is also not appropriate to label most of these patients as anxious or depressed. I now explain this to patients, and tell them that the problem . . . [Full text of this article]

Charles T Vivian, consultant occupational physician

Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester GL1 3NN

charlie.vivian@glos.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Beware of mentioning psychosocial factors
Ben Goldacre
BMJ 2007 335: 801. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Stop Press! Doctors acknowledge limitations of the bio-medical model.
Christine Bundy
bmj.com, 5 Nov 2007 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ