Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:900 (3 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39381.514780.BE
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Goldacre says he sounded like an ass when explaining the complex pathogenesis of back pain on radio, but he is unduly harsh on himself.1 His message is not wrong, and he is not an ass. However, the message might have been better gift wrapped.
Western medicine is based on the biomedical model. This model is reductionist—all symptoms can be explained by underlying pathology—and dualist—if there is no pathology, it's all in your head. This model was drilled into us at medical school and is the principal model for the National Health Service. Society largely accepts the model too.
But it's wrong. For up to 90% of people presenting to their general practitioner with genuine physical symptoms, the symptoms are not explained by pathology. It is also not appropriate to label most of these patients as anxious or depressed. I now explain this to patients, and tell them that the problem
Charles T Vivian, consultant occupational physician
Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester GL1 3NN
charlie.vivian@glos.nhs.uk
Read all Rapid Responses