BMJ  2007;335:900 (3 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39381.503287.BE

Letters

Honouring advance decisions

You don't in psychiatry

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Dyer reports, "A new statutory right for patients to say in advance what treatments they would want to refuse if they later lose the capacity to take decisions came into force this week. Doctors will have to abide by the new advance decisions to refuse treatment (ADRTs) or risk criminal or civil proceedings in the courts."1 Alas, this is true only for medical patients. It is not true for mental health patients. Indeed, it cannot be true so long as we have special laws for such patients.

Dyer adds that "Patients will not be able to . . . require a doctor to do anything unlawful." There is the rub. In psychiatry, procedures that incarcerated mental patients view as protection of their civil rights, psychiatrists regard as interference with their duty to protect patients and the public from the ravages of mental illness, an interpretation the courts uphold.

In short, . . . [Full text of this article]

Thomas Szasz, professor emeritus of psychiatry

SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210

tszasz@aol.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Patients win right to have their advance decisions honoured
Clare Dyer
BMJ 2007 335: 688-689. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Advance Decisions
Robert H Keys
bmj.com, 16 Nov 2007 [Full text]
You don't in psychiatry
Thomas Szasz
bmj.com, 17 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Dr. Szasz is Right on Psychiatric Wills
Keith Hoeller
bmj.com, 19 Nov 2007 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ