Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:899-900 (3 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39381.484873.BE
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Ashworth argues that mobile phone video footage is useful when treating sick children.1 We know of two recent cases in which such video footage provided by parents was valuable in the diagnosis and treatment of upper airway obstruction.
A previously healthy 2.5 year old boy was reported by his parents to have severe respiratory distress at night, which completely resolved during the day. He was seen several times by a family doctor and ear, nose, and throat specialist. No diagnosis was made as he seemed well. Finally, his parents presented a video recording showing him in severe respiratory distress while asleep (figure
). Direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy were then carried out under general anaesthesia. He needed urgent adenotonsillectomy and made an uneventful recovery with complete resolution of his symptoms.
| |||||||||||
Graham A M Wilson, consultant paediatric anaesthetist1, Thomas Engelhardt, consultant paediatric anaesthetist1, Bruno Marciniak, staff anaesthetist2
1 Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, 2 Clinique d'Anesthesie Reanimation de l'Hopital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU Lille, 59037 Lille Cedex, France
graham.wilson@nhs.net
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.